IS THE PENALTY FOR
TREE FELLING TOO MILD?
Nasser Lalljee Mumbra
IF the ban on recruitment
of Forest Department vigilance staff is not lifted
soon, we may soon have a department without policemen
that would give poachers a field day.
Speaking
with A K Jha conservator of forests of the Forest Division
Thane Circle, one gets the impression that the forest
department in doing a good job despite insuffucuent
staff.
“The
government ban, brought into effect about five years
ago, on recruitment has caused some problems but we
have solved some of these problems. But the government
recently lifted the ban on recruitment of police department
may too soon be allowed to recruit staff to police our
forests,” he adds.
“Last
year, about 100 trucks carrying timbre were caught in
and around Thane. When trucks carrying illegally felled
trees are confiscated, informers get paid Rs. 2,500
per truck gets auctioned with the logs, the informer
maker anothertidy sum,” Jha reveals.
Another
forest department official, speaking on the condition
of anonymity said, “The fine of about Rs 2,500
and a jail term of six months seems to mild when you
take into account that an average truck-load of teak
fetches Rs 25,000.00; and a truck of 10 cubic meters
can hold teak worth about Rs 2,50,000.
A
logical step, according to another forest department
official would be to station police in places like Lakda
Bazaar where illegally felled wood is sold
Indian
laws state that though some trees may be cut, others
have to be monitored- the root observed and scrutinized
before felling. For those caught, the legal machinery
seems too weak and easily overcome. Sources reveal that
there is only one government pleader to fight cases
to illegal felling of trees and poaching.
In
the forest department’s Thane Circle, the major
contributor of losses last year was not the much sought
after teak trees but trees like Dawda, Kher, Ain and
Injali the wood of which are used in erecting hutments.
While the felling of teak trees probably mounted to
Rs 60 lakh, wood from Dawda, Kher, Ain and Injaliwere
to the tune of Rs 1.7 crore,
“If
you look logically, the ban of the past five years on
recruitment of the vigilance department needs to be
lifted soon and fresh staff needs to be inducted and
trained. Very soon the oldstaff will retire and then
what? No recruitment of forest staff or RFOs has taken
place for almost 10 years and we have been short staffed
by 35 per cent for the last two years or more. Soon
we may have no staff or if at all they induct new people,
there may not be any skilled supervisors to train them.”
Says another official.
Despite
these drawbacks, the forest department has done well
in reducing tree cutting by 30 per cent in the last
one year by increased vigilance through wireless technology
and with the help of police departments form the bordering
states. |